|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
18-12-2011, 04:18 PM | #31 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,425
|
That's why I smiled when the Wikileaks communique mentioned FoA passing up funding for potentially lucrative exports....
You've got to be kidding.............. |
||
18-12-2011, 05:56 PM | #32 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,451
|
Quote:
1. William Clay Jnr realised he was not the man to run Ford as it was going down and had the good sense to stand aside and get a new CEO. 2. They were blessed to get someone as competent as Mullay onboard with the company. Very few CEO's in the US could turn Ford around at that point, Ford lucked out and got one who could. If either of those things hadn't come together, you would have been reading about Ford going into bankruptcy. It was a very, very close call thing. Basically Ford did go to the wall, but they went earlier then the other two and only the inheritance and investments of the Ford extended family kept the company solvent long enough to turn it around as it burned though the cash. If any of the Ford family had not decided to put their inheritance on the line, it was game over for Ford. It got that close. Many questioned that it could be recovered at the time, but I think for as much as family pride as good business sense, they put everything on the line to keep the company going. It was certainly no dream run for Ford. More by the grace of God goes us sort of situation. Mullay had to change a lot of cultural problems within Ford and the fact he wasn't a "car guy" brought up in that twisted executive culture that runs American cars companies certainly was a blessing. Look up some stories on Mullay and how he really shook up the Ford engineers and managers to see how different he was from what they use to do. Their situation now is much better than the other two, but again, thats Mullay's doing. Get a bad CEO after him and all that good work could be undone in less than a decade. I think if the Ford family could clone the guy and keep in the top job for the next 100 years they happily would, but Mullay is 66, so realistically he will probably retire sometime before this decade is done. In the car industry I wouldn't imagine there is much time for gloating. You are always only a decade away from insolvency if the wrong strategic decisions are made, no matter who you are. Look at a local level how much of a mess was made to Ford Australia by poor choices in leadership and the decisions that lead from that. Falcon goes from number one to not making the top ten. Dan Last edited by DanielXR8; 18-12-2011 at 06:15 PM. |
|||
18-12-2011, 06:35 PM | #33 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,425
|
Dan, Actually a lot of the credit should go to to Mark fields, Don Leclair and business heads at Ford.
Mark Fields crafted the original plan called, "The Way Forward" Which was launched before Alan mulally came on board. The plan was then expanded to completely revamp North American operations along the lines of what was done in Europe and South America, this also involved a daring move by Don Leaclair, the Chief Financial Officer to Mortgage everything. About this time, Bill Ford Hired Alan Mulally who at a Meeting asked what he could do to make the plan work, Don asked if he would meet with the banks to strengthen their case for lending, Mulally agreed and with his undertakings, the deal was clinched... Alan Mulally brought proper corporate governance, the folks at Ford all got on board because they wanted a culture change, they wanted their company to succeed and those that wanted to keep their own little empires were quickly shown the door. Ford arguably achieved just as much financially and more culturally by doing its restructuring outside bankruptcy than GM did in CH 11. IMO, GM were saved yes but their board and CEOs are unrepentant, continuing to suggest that only dumb luck separates them and Ford. Anyone with a brain can see the difference a mile off..... On the local scene, we are seeing impressive sales of diesel Territory, something Geoff Polites wanted here years ago. Hopefully, the Falcon gets some love and sales come back a bit there but I have a feeling that Territory will now carry Falcon... |
||
18-12-2011, 07:34 PM | #34 | |||
You dig, we stick!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
|
Quote:
|
|||
18-12-2011, 08:20 PM | #35 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
|
this thread reminds me of fat chicks who pay out hot ones.... Just sayin'
|
||
18-12-2011, 08:26 PM | #36 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,425
|
At least somebody pays out because GM sure doesn't.........
The once mighty GM can barely sell 20,000 more vehicles than Ford in the US, what a come down..... |
||
18-12-2011, 08:31 PM | #37 | ||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
"the world is yours"
however, greed ruins that creed.
__________________
|
||
18-12-2011, 08:32 PM | #38 | |||
You dig, we stick!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,461
|
Quote:
|
|||
18-12-2011, 09:03 PM | #39 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,425
|
Don't get me wrong, GM NA didn't do Holden any favors, three out of three RWD car platforms mucked up by their interference/ influence/promises....
1) Sigma started in the late 1990s was to be delivered in 2002 (as VY?) but Cadillac wanted too many changes so given over to them 2) Zeta started as evolution/better mouse trap of Sigma, GMNA want changes to suit their market = bigger and heavier, seems that Cadillac Sigma is too expensive, cabin too small, to suit the intended ranges of vehicles GMNA wanted to order. Then they welch on project after project over fuel economy fears even though Commodore uses same engines as US FWDs. 3) Alpha has roots with Kappa based Torana TT36 concept, Cadillac took over project making almost as big and heavy as Zeta. Last edited by jpd80; 18-12-2011 at 09:08 PM. |
||
19-12-2011, 10:20 AM | #40 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,312
|
Quote:
__________________
My ride: 2007 Falcon Ute BF XR8 Orange, MTO. |
|||
19-12-2011, 04:50 PM | #41 | ||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
How did they go from being billions in debt to having $45 billion in the black?
__________________
|
||
19-12-2011, 06:30 PM | #42 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
|
Part of the government bailout was a cash injection
|
||
19-12-2011, 07:33 PM | #43 | |||
Cobblers!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Shire, NSW
Posts: 4,489
|
Quote:
__________________
Ego BFII Ghia Titanium Silver E53 X5 4.4i Gunmetal EF XR6. Now retired from active duty. Roses are red. Violets are blue. OS X rocks. Homage to you. |
|||
19-12-2011, 07:51 PM | #44 | |||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
19-12-2011, 09:04 PM | #45 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,425
|
Quote:
too many changes so Holden were forced to hand Sigma over and begin again on Zeta. |
|||
20-12-2011, 05:59 AM | #46 | ||
2003 BA Falcon XT
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wyndhamvale, Victoria
Posts: 1,138
|
Ok so a lot of this has gone over my head. Can someone let me know:
* will GM still be called GM? * as they are now in a form of bankruptcy, what does this mean for the ordinary workers that may have been there all their life? * iconic American brands such as Chev and Caddillac. Will they still be built? * just how many companies do GM own? Seems Ford dropped a lot off in the last decade and is now safe and Turning a profit. Thanks guys!
__________________
2003 BA Ford Falcon XT IMPCO LPG Vapour Injection. DETAILING Meguiar's NXT Car Wash Collonite #845 Insulator Wax Bowden's Own Happy Ending & Fully Slick Chemtech CT-18 Truck Wash (Wheels & Chassis) Bowden's Own Wheely Clean & Tyre Sheen Bowden's Own Three Way Paint Decontamination Spray OILS AND FILTERS Nulon Full Synthetic 10w-40 Nulon Long Life Coolant Ryco Oil & Air Filters My Instagram Account: @ba_falcon2003
|
||
20-12-2011, 06:09 AM | #47 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,425
|
Quote:
- form an old and new company - move as many salvageable assets as possible to the new company - move as many debts and liabilities as possible into the old companies - leave all creditors behind in debtors court. The new GM was then floated with $45 billion thanks to the government who set up an Escrow cash fund for GM to operate properly and pay off any debts that couldn't be left behind with old GM. The UAW was owed money for its pension plan so also took a stake in new GM. At the moment new GM has $45 billion cash in the bank and only about $7 billion debt. And yes, they are still called GM and Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, Cadillac, Holden are all there. |
|||