|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
30-11-2005, 04:50 PM | #151 | |||
Built Ford Tough
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: State of Euphoria Mod: F-Series
Posts: 3,035
|
Quote:
__________________
Black on white '83 SWB F100 C6 auto 351C on gas and on the ground --> Project Thread '55 F100, just a roller at the moment, new project Silver MY12 Volkswagen Amarok |
|||
30-11-2005, 04:54 PM | #152 | ||
Is tuna chicken or fish?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 71
|
plane goes this way -----> by the explanation on the first page that would mean the conveyer is going <------ that way, so all I did was define ----> as positive and <---- as negative... that's all.
|
||
30-11-2005, 04:55 PM | #153 | ||
Is tuna chicken or fish?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 71
|
also, the conveyor would HAVE to accelerate to match the speed
|
||
30-11-2005, 04:56 PM | #154 | ||
Bolt Nerd
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ojochal, Costa Rica (Pura Vida!)
Posts: 15,101
|
Ok... Obviously none of you took the time to look at the "definitive" video?
Try this... (on your treadmill) or if you have access to a conveyor.. Put a skateboard with a fan (normal household type fan) on the deck. Turn the fan on, simultaneously activating the treadmill in the opposite direction. The skateboard will move AGAINST the rotation of the treadmill because of the fan propulsion.. Will it not? : :
__________________
Current vehicles.. Yamaha Rhino UTV, SWB 4L TJ Jeep, and boring Lhd RAV4 Bionic BF F6... UPDATE: Replaced by Shiro White 370z 7A Roadster. SOLD Workhack: FG Silhouette XR50 Turbo ute (11.63@127.44mph) SOLD 2 wheels.. 2015 103ci HD Wideglide.. SOLD SOLD THE LOT, Voted with our feet and relocated to COSTA RICA for some Pura Vida! (Ex Blood Orange #023 FPV Pursuit owner : ) |
||
30-11-2005, 04:59 PM | #155 | ||
Is tuna chicken or fish?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 71
|
the wheels of the skateboard will rotate at the same speed as the treadmill, if the force produced by the fan is enough to exactly compensate for the force applied to wheels by the treadmill, if it is GREATER the skateboard will go off the other end
|
||
30-11-2005, 04:59 PM | #156 | ||||
FORMERLY TX3DUDE
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: "THE GONG"
Posts: 2,487
|
Quote:
This conveyer has a control system that tracks the plane speed and tunes the speed of the conveyer to be exactly the same (but in opposite direction). this means that if the plane is moving forward at 200kmh(takeoff speed) then the conveyer will be spinning the wheels at 200kmh in the oppostie direction... these means that a speedo on the wheels will show twice that of the air speed but the air speed willstill be 200kmh enough to lift the plane.. you people are constantl;y forgetting that a planes engines move the plane through the air not on the ground!
__________________
Quote:
|
||||
30-11-2005, 05:02 PM | #157 | ||||||
To shreads you say?!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: FNQ
Posts: 538
|
Don't get mad here guys, its just a bloody theoretical question. Just remember that the question assumes that the magical conveyer can inversly match the speed of the plane.
If the plane is stationary bar the wheels whipping around at a million miles an hour, the rest of the plane is still going to be stationary isn't it? No movement, no lift. <edit>tx3dude, thats an assumption. Quote:
Quote:
And sure, in reality it is impossible, (as mentioned above) in reality it would take off. But this theoretical question engenders some assumptions.
__________________
BAII XR6 Ute (manual) Winter white. Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by SunDrifter; 30-11-2005 at 05:10 PM. |
||||||
30-11-2005, 05:03 PM | #158 | |||
Is tuna chicken or fish?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
Dude, don't forget, airplanes start off being stationary! also, the wheels would only be spinning at 200kmph |
|||
30-11-2005, 05:08 PM | #159 | |||
X-Series Club Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 1,952
|
Quote:
__________________
PROJECT - '77 XC Falcon 351C - Click Here DAILY - '05 Ford Territory BIKE - '12 Suzuki GS 500 |
|||
30-11-2005, 05:20 PM | #160 | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide SA
Posts: 5,584
|
I suggest this aircraft is capable of the launch.
__________________
1965 XP Falcon Deluxe Sedan 1978 XC Falcon Wagon Rallypack 2003 BA Fairlane G220 Windsor Powah!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7hT9dxD2hM |
||
30-11-2005, 05:31 PM | #161 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 239
|
The only ONE contributing factor as to wether an aircraft will take off is the effect of the wing moving through the air. The fuselage, engines and tyres have no direct impact on the airplane acheiving lift. They all have indirect impact in the ability for the wing to achieve momentum throught he air which in sequence causes the wing to have lift in an upwards motion carrying the wheels, fuselage and engines with it.
If the wing were to remain stationary then it would produce zero lift, and this is what would happen if a airplane was placed on a conveyer that would match the airplane for acceleration an speed. |
||
30-11-2005, 05:43 PM | #162 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 239
|
well i made that post after reading the first page but after reading the rest i reckon i'm wrong and it will take off. Like others have said it will accelerate as normal with the tyres doing twice the normal speed!
|
||
30-11-2005, 06:04 PM | #163 | |||
Regular Schmuck
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,640
|
Quote:
A yacht powered solely by wind in its sail travelling against a current. For the sake of argument we'll say that the force the sail is generating is equal to the current in the opposite direction. Using your argument you're suggesting that because there's no drive in the keel of the boat, travelling upstream in a boat with a sail negates the force of the current...? |
|||
30-11-2005, 06:08 PM | #164 | ||
GT
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
|
if a fly was in a car travelling 80kms an hour and the fly was hovering between the 2 front seats how fast would the fly be flying . answer = 0 km/hr
if the fly was on the roof hovering answer = 80km/hr if the car was on a conveyer belt fly on roof = 0 fly inside = 0 if the fly was on a car that was popelled by a jet engine and the wheels spun freely and the jet was set to 80km/hr the fly would be flying at =80kms hour on roof. and the cars wheels would be spinning at 160kms /hr. |
||
30-11-2005, 06:12 PM | #165 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,198
|
I am having lots of difficulty understanding why anyone would think the plane WILL fly. Let's not bring variables into it, it's a simple case. Wheels, friction, bearings, airspeed, groundspeed all having nothing to do with it. If the plane's forward momemtum is negated by the conveyor running in the opposite direction, you simply do NOT have any air travelling over the wings, it is a stationary object, a lead balloon if you like. NO go anywhere!
__________________
FROZEN WHITE XR5 TURBO & MOONDUST SILVER XR5 TURBO PREVIOUS RIDES AU3 VENOM RED XR8, 19" SILVER ARGENTS, REBEL BODY KIT & 6/4 BREMBOS MARS RED FG MK2 XR6 ECOLPI, SILVER ARGENT 19" RIMS & TINT BLOOD ORANGE BA GTP, QUAD EXHAUST, SUNROOF, CHIPPED, SS CAI, 320KW NAROOMA BLUE AU3 HERROD XR8- SS CAI, TS RIMS, 6/4 BREMBOS, TWIN SPOILER, REBEL BODY KIT & TUNED BY ELITE VENOM GTP, HERROD EXHAUST, DVD PLAYER, WINDOW TINT, SS CAI, STEALTH VENOM AU11 TE50, HERROD LOWERED, HEADERS AND EXHAUST [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
||
30-11-2005, 06:19 PM | #166 | ||
Regular Schmuck
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,640
|
After 5 pages, I'm a believer. The plane will take off for the reason most people are suggesting.
That is, the thrust is independent of the driving wheels and that as much as you speed up the conveyor it will never negate the effect of the thrust (leaving obvious physical impossibilities behind). The engines are sucking air in and expelling air out which creates forward momentum regardless of what the wheels are doing. The driving force is the thrust created from the engines, the wheels are negligable in this case. Forward momentum will be created by the engines sucking in and expelling air, the wheels don't factor in any equation since they're free spinning objects that have no bearing in driving the plane forward, air will flow across the wings and the jet will take off. |
||
30-11-2005, 06:20 PM | #167 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Australia
Posts: 3,173
|
Quote:
The problem is... The momentum is NOT negated by the conveyor... so not taking into account durability of tyres/wheels etc it would take off. |
|||
30-11-2005, 06:23 PM | #168 | |||
GT
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
|
Quote:
|
|||
30-11-2005, 06:35 PM | #169 | ||
Zoom Zoom
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,352
|
Funniest thread I've read in a long long time. It has 250 people who each KNOW they're right. Funny thing is, there's about 15 different answers so far!!!
But I know the truth, it'll fly. So the rest of you can stay sitting at the Maccas in the terminal lamenting over your cancelled conveyor flight while I'm on my way around the world with Lynx Jet... stopping by Glengarry, Pyongyang, Ponoka then Baja.
__________________
2012 Mazda3 MPS
|
||
30-11-2005, 06:37 PM | #170 | ||
*Smart *** comment here*
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South East Vic
Posts: 179
|
The scientific answer is no.
Almost... Almost everything stated is right. The wheels will spin at twice the air speed, the engines will suck air though and cause air propulsion at the rate of the belt etc etc... HOWEVER the aircraft displacement is ZERO. Ever noticed that when your in a gym and on a treadmill you tend to sweat more than when you are out running along the road??? That is because your moving and when you're actually moving you have a displacement and the wind is flowing around you and causing evaporation. When you're on a treadmill this effect doesn’t occur. HOW does this relate you ask? Simple, a plane requires more than just thrust from the engines to take off. It is aerodynamically designed, and its wings require airflow due to displacement to actually gain enough lift to push the aircraft off the ground. IF the plane is on a treadmill, this doesn’t occur so either you have a infinite loop and the plane just keeps on kicking with the treadmill, or you have a plane on its belly because as it pushed off the treadmill the air around the wings wasn’t pushing at the rate flowing through the thrusters and it simply falls as physics doesn’t allow it to gain lift. Don't believe me… go ask a physicist... wait, that’s me!!! :
__________________
1997 4.0L EL Falcon GLi Sedan Auto ---------------------- 2.5" Cat Back Mandrel Bent Exhaust to Two Lukey Sports Mufflers and a 3.5" Dump Pipe Lowered all round on King Spring Super Lows Tinted Windows, Pioneer MP3 Player and Audio System K&N High Flow Air Filter Mounted in Original Air Box Trip Computer NGK Sports Performance Leads NGK Sports Plugs Autotecnica Oil Catch Can
|
||
30-11-2005, 06:39 PM | #171 | ||
.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bundoora
Posts: 7,199
|
...imagine this convo down the pub...it'd end up an all-in!
If the conveyor belt is matching the speed of the forward movement of the plane, obviously as the plane thrusts foreward under power, the conveyor will go forward too! The pilot can push as hard as he can on the throttle to get more thrust, which will only make the wheels turn faster, which will makew the runway turn faster! And you have the drama of no airspeed to create the lower pressure unde the wings to lift it! One of the posts said that the wheel bearings will explode before takeoff....i'm going with that one! |
||
30-11-2005, 06:44 PM | #172 | |||
Zoom Zoom
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,352
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 Mazda3 MPS
|
|||
30-11-2005, 06:48 PM | #173 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,198
|
Quote:
__________________
FROZEN WHITE XR5 TURBO & MOONDUST SILVER XR5 TURBO PREVIOUS RIDES AU3 VENOM RED XR8, 19" SILVER ARGENTS, REBEL BODY KIT & 6/4 BREMBOS MARS RED FG MK2 XR6 ECOLPI, SILVER ARGENT 19" RIMS & TINT BLOOD ORANGE BA GTP, QUAD EXHAUST, SUNROOF, CHIPPED, SS CAI, 320KW NAROOMA BLUE AU3 HERROD XR8- SS CAI, TS RIMS, 6/4 BREMBOS, TWIN SPOILER, REBEL BODY KIT & TUNED BY ELITE VENOM GTP, HERROD EXHAUST, DVD PLAYER, WINDOW TINT, SS CAI, STEALTH VENOM AU11 TE50, HERROD LOWERED, HEADERS AND EXHAUST [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
|||
30-11-2005, 06:50 PM | #174 | |||
*Smart *** comment here*
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South East Vic
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
__________________
1997 4.0L EL Falcon GLi Sedan Auto ---------------------- 2.5" Cat Back Mandrel Bent Exhaust to Two Lukey Sports Mufflers and a 3.5" Dump Pipe Lowered all round on King Spring Super Lows Tinted Windows, Pioneer MP3 Player and Audio System K&N High Flow Air Filter Mounted in Original Air Box Trip Computer NGK Sports Performance Leads NGK Sports Plugs Autotecnica Oil Catch Can
|
|||
30-11-2005, 06:52 PM | #175 | |||
Regular Schmuck
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,640
|
Quote:
|
|||
30-11-2005, 06:55 PM | #176 | ||
.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bundoora
Posts: 7,199
|
I've finished a beer or 3, and I'm stuffed if i can agree with the "take off" theories...
Theoretically the pilot could be punting the thing flat stick, but the conveyor would notice the increase in wheel speed and move faster backward. In effect, the whole thing is on rollers. Even with thrust the wheels need to move foreward so that the appropriate wind speed can be achieved, but this will be cancelled out by the treadmill effect The plane needs to move foreward to get lift, which is impossible with the bloody treadmill working overtime! |
||
30-11-2005, 06:55 PM | #177 | |||
.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bundoora
Posts: 7,199
|
Quote:
I knew what i meant! lol |
|||
30-11-2005, 07:16 PM | #178 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Quote:
I bounced the same question of a few buddys. 1) QANTAS Captain 747 2) Ex QANTAS Captain (ret) chief check & training 747, 707, constellation 3) Commercial pilot, ex chief pilot for turbine charter organisation 4) Commercial pilot, line check & ground school for major freight organisation 5) LAME 6) AME Between us over 30,000 hours (mostly them) All say it will fly, but then we all left school a long time ago.... |
|||
30-11-2005, 07:29 PM | #179 | |||
*Smart *** comment here*
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South East Vic
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
I can't see how the lift and drag would be simulated on a treadmill... Although I may be missing something, so I would love for you and your buddies, and the person to whom that comment was actually directed at to actually tell me how it works, within reason, I mean because I say so really counts for , there's no reason behind it. I mean last time I checked the way a plane operated... basic theory is that, the engine creates thrust, allowing forward direction and travel (effectively pulling the aircraft through the air as it sucks then pushes), while the air which it is travelling around the aircraft (not apparent on a treadmill) travels over and under the wing span. due to the shape of the wings and the calculated area, low pressure is created and the factors of lift and drag occur, allowing the plane to actually lift of the ground. The flaps, when correctly positioned allow for equillibrium, say when flat at 30,000 feet... That is my basic, dumb downed idea of the actual operation of an airplane, the basics of the physics and aerodynamics... I can't see how all of that occurs on a treadmill, as the treadmill effectively renders the dissplacement zero and thus the aircraft stationary... Which means the air is being sucked directly into the engines, no airflow around the wings and thus no low pressure... same as when you're on a treadmill at the gym, you sweat because air doesn't circulate the body and evaporate the sweat. So now I want to know!!!! Fill me in!
__________________
1997 4.0L EL Falcon GLi Sedan Auto ---------------------- 2.5" Cat Back Mandrel Bent Exhaust to Two Lukey Sports Mufflers and a 3.5" Dump Pipe Lowered all round on King Spring Super Lows Tinted Windows, Pioneer MP3 Player and Audio System K&N High Flow Air Filter Mounted in Original Air Box Trip Computer NGK Sports Performance Leads NGK Sports Plugs Autotecnica Oil Catch Can
|
|||
30-11-2005, 07:46 PM | #180 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,083
|
Quote:
__________________
Older, wiser, poorer. Now in Euro-Trash. VW Coupe V6 4motion.
|
|||