|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Bar For non Automotive Related Chat |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-06-2008, 07:01 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
Slow Learner
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 93
|
Hi,
Just watching the replay of the Aussies test against the Windies and I came across the question: What use is Stuart Macgill? or more to the point: WHY send Stuart Macgill? Now, I realise that the Aussie selectors have been spoiled by having Warney as their #1 spinner for the last decade and Macgill has been a poor stand-in ( at best! )when Warney was unavailable. But why have him as Warney replacement???? There are a heap of Young, talented spin bowlers in the Domestic comp to choose from let alone Michael Clarke! Stuart Macgill is a third rate bowler at best. He's not a team player, bats worse than Phil Tuffnel and is no better in the field than a wet towel! He bowls way too many full-tosses, half-trackers and general sh.1te and most of his wickets come from batsmen error! Why not send a young, up & coming spin bowler? Its only the Windies for goodness sake, not India at home, and with Macgill knockin 40yrs on the Door, they would have a future in the side! Please tell me the selectors point of view... |
||
|
|
Calling all Stuart Macgill fans!
Threaded Mode